1 Thing Each Day…

“Increasingly, however, the artwork’s “immaterial” side came down from its idealist cloud and took on the comparatively tangible form of writing. In Duchamp’s case, these writings were highly idiosyncratic texts reproduced in an equally idiosyncratic form, as facsimiles of original handwritten notes; they emphasized that the linguistic “explanation” is itself as problematic as the visual component of the work, and that Duchamp, like Mary Poppins, never really explains anything.”(Lutticken, year: 30).

This quote taken from Sven Lutticken’s essay, “The Writing on the Wall”, states exactly how Duchamp’s work came across. His ‘idiosyncratic’ approach to art could be said to represent the entire structure of the Dada movement. The way in which Duchamp constructed ideas and the way in which he thought focused entirely on the breakdown of meaning. Why did he choose the subject matter he did? I’m interested in the way in which he caused confusion or made sense of the inexplicable.

Graeme Clark



About graemeaclark

I am a 22 year old art student, studying Intermedia at Edinburgh College of Art, in 4th year. View all posts by graemeaclark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: